How ART:I:CURATE faked my artworks to fund their Kickstarter


The purpose of this page is to make public the conduct of the online curation platform, ART:I:CURATE.

This is in response to the recent discovery that ART:I:CURATE has been producing and supplying unauthorised, fake copies of my artworks to fund their Kickstarter campaign. Their actions constitute a serious, unacceptable and unlawful infringement of copyright, as well as a complete breach of trust.

As I believe the email correspondence presented here plainly demonstrates, ART:I:CURATE have been disingenuous and deceitful in their dealings with me. By openly publishing this material here, it is my hope that other artists, curators and art lovers will avoid finding themselves in a similar position, enabling them to make their own judgment as to the trustworthiness of ART:I:CURATE.

I have subsequently also become aware of other accounts of ART:I:CURATE’s unscrupulous behaviour, with a number of fellow arts professionals having had similarly unpleasant dealings with the company. Whilst for now I am concentrating on the facts of my own experience here, I hope that this page will contribute to the the much-needed discussion about the exploitation of artists, curators and interns in the art world, and the potential pitfalls of online art platforms, encouraging others to publish their own first-hand accounts.

In addition, since at the time of writing I’ve been unable to satisfactorily determine the full extent of ART:I:CURATE’s actions, I hope that this page will also serve to alert any other Kickstarter backers who might have received one of these fake prints.

Apologies for the rather long-winded nature of the content of this site—all in the name of thoroughness and transparency—but hopefully there’s enough here to prove engaging and (oddly) entertaining, due to the sheer audacity and barefaced cheek of ART:I:CURATE’s behaviour.

So, here goes…


Back in March 2013, I was invited by ART:I:CURATE to join their newly-launched online art platform. Although the site’s founders have backgrounds in fashion and banking(!), and not the art world, I had initially been impressed enough with their apparent professionalism. Since I had a couple of good friends whose works were also featured on the site, I duly agreed to join up, contributing the same small online documentation jpeg photos that appear on my own website (which can’t be printed out at any great size).

I also signed a very standard consignment agreement with them on 21st June 2013, in which, needless to say, there was absolutely nothing that permitted them to reproduce my work without my express permission. (It did, however, state that “D/ARTE may arrange promotion and publication of Artworks through means agreed in advance by both parties.“)

On 3rd June 2013, even before I had signed this agreement, ART:I:CURATE had asked me if they could use my image, The Ontic Order (II), on some postcards. Around 50 were to be printed and given away free of charge to some of their “special members”. I had no objection to this, and so provided them with a suitable image file.

At this point, a few alarm bells did start to ring, as they began asking for a massive file many times larger than that needed to produce a postcard. The 7012 pixel file they requested was, in fact, exactly the size needed to make an A2 print. I questioned ART:I:CURATE several times about this, before sending them a more reasonable, but still fairly large, 3000 pixel file. At the time, I had no reason not to trust them, and so I simply put this down to a lack of technical know-how on their part. In retrospect, however, I think it’s clear to see the real motives behind ART:I:CURATE’s requests, and I’ve posted this rather farcical email exchange here for your amusement…


Several months passed and, since I’d never received the 10 postcards I’d been promised, I simply forgot about them and assumed it had come to nothing. Then, in November 2013, completely out of the blue, I received an email from a gentleman by the name of Christos, whom I’d never encountered before, which began as follows:

“Dear Luke Turner, I recently acquired one of your prints — Ontic Order (II) — through my support of Articurate…”

“What the…?” I thought to myself. I knew for a fact that Christos had not acquired one of my prints, and so at first assumed that he must have been somewhat confused. I immediately contacted ART:I:CURATE to ask them what was going on, and they assured me that:

“…he has not acquired your print as we are not selling prints (or else you-and we- would know).”

However, as I began to discuss this further with Christos (who, fortunately, turns out to be a really lovely and understanding chap!), the truth of the matter began to emerge. Christos had received a print from ART:I:CURATE, purporting to be a genuine special edition art print of mine. This, however, was in fact a fake, crudely produced with the file I had supplied ART:I:CURATE for the postcard.

Christos had acquired this print through ART:I:CURATE’s Kickstarter page. Here, such prints were being advertised as a “Special edition A2 art print”, included in a number of packages offered in exchange for contributions of between £75 and £1000. Christos himself had paid £350.

In total, ART:I:CURATE’s Kickstarter page reveals that they raised at least £9,825 from 79 people through packages offering “Special edition art prints”. I may never know for certain exactly how many of these packages included the fake prints of my work, although I am hopeful that Kickstarter themselves will assist me further here.

Christos agreed to meet a couple of days later to give me the print. I had been expecting this to be some sort of flimsy poster, but it was, to my horror, a professional looking—though poorly executed—print on heavyweight fine art type paper. (See the photo at the top of this page.) There was no doubt that this was being passed off as the real thing, plain and simple.

Christos also kindly provided me with the original email that ART:I:CURATE had sent him after his Kickstarter payment, in which my print (as well as those of two other artists) was offered, alongside a photo of the original, genuine artwork. I was gobsmacked to see that this email was dated 24th May 2013, which is a full 10 days before ART:I:CURATE first requested the postcard file from me, confirming the full scope of their deceit.

Again, I have copied this Kickstarter email here.


ART:I:CURATE’s response to all this has been utterly shameful. I have given them every opportunity to try to put things right, but they have completely failed to acknowledge the seriousness of their actions, and have repeatedly refused to provide me with all the information and answers I need in order to attempt to repair the damage they have caused.

There are numerous examples of their ridiculous lack of professionalism evidenced in the email correspondence presented here. At one point, they attempt to fob me off with some nonsense about Kickstarter’s terms of service (which they have clearly breached themselves), disingenuously attempting to assert that the prints were “promotional gifts,” and that “there has been no sale, invoicing or transaction in any relation to your work”—as if this would somehow justify them producing and supplying these unauthorised prints.

Furthermore, they point to the inclusion of the words “Copyright Luke Turner” at the bottom of the prints as in some way legitimising the use of my image. As they should be well aware, this is obviously not how copyright law works, and such an action is effectively tantamount to forging my signature.

ART:I:CURATE even tries to argue that these illegitimate prints have somehow increased the “visibility and value of your work,” and, most preposterously perhaps, they let me know that “it was actually a cost to the company to produce these materials.” You couldn’t make this stuff up.

My most pressing concern now is to find out exactly how many of these unauthorised prints were made, and to account for them all. Pinning ART:I:CURATE down on this matter has been particularly painful, with them originally stating simply that “a few prints were made”, before eventually informing me that they had four in their possession, which they have now posted to me (pictured at the top of this page). However, given ART:I:CURATE’s attitude, I have no reason to take their word for it that these are the only prints in existence. Worryingly, despite my repeated requests, they have refused to confirm or deny whether prints of other sizes were ever made or supplied, which obviously leads me to fear that this may in fact be the case.

In conclusion, given my experience, I would personally advise everyone to give a wide berth to ART:I:CURATE. Frankly, I’ve needed all this like I need a hole in the head, and getting to the bottom of their mess has already taken up far too much of my time. I do think it’s important, however, that I speak out, and I’m very grateful if you’ve managed to read this far. I’d also appreciate it if people could share this page with anyone it may be of relevance to, to try to ensure that this sort of thing is never repeated.

ART:I:CURATE have made it clear to me that they “reserve the right to pursue any damange [sic] to our reputation, should false information be given to our network of backers, members, artists or collectors.”

However, I have absolutely no intention of giving out any false information to destroy their reputation.

They’ve just gone and done that themselves.

Click here to view my email correspondence with ART:I:CURATE


UPDATE: In an article for Hyperallergic published 23.01.14, ART:I:CURATE are quoted as claiming that they had not had any contact with me at the time of their Kickstarter campaign:

“art:i:curate raised funds […] through Kickstarter in April 2013, 2 months before any communication and collaboration with Mr. Turner started. Mr. Turner’s work was neither known to us at the time, nor mentioned on Kickstarter.”

This is another blatant lie. I have posted a copy here of an email I received from ART:I:CURATE, and a questionnaire they requested from me, both dated 26th March 2013. This is further, indisputable evidence of their continued intent to deceive.

In addition, I was contacted this week by one of the other two artists whose work was offered in the Kickstarter email of 24th May 2013. Like me, she says she had no idea that her works were being supplied in this way, without her consent.



  1. Pretty bs. Shared!! People behaving like this should at least be acknowledged publicly for their behaviour. Cheers for sharing!

  2. Please, please get a lawyer involved. It is not enough to just expose/shame them. I fear that you will never get to the bottom of this otherwise. They are clearly in breach of copyright. Good luck.

  3. Thanks Eva, and thanks for the shares everybody. I’m still exploring my options on the legal front. I thought it was vital to get this information out there sooner rather than later anyhow, before something like this happened to anyone else.

  4. Sorry to hear this happened mate. Too many examples of this happening right now unfortunately.. Such rubbish, and the gall these companies have… Great work on taking the time to set this site up Luke.

  5. Having experienced their incompetence, how sad this is no surprise.
    I have heard arti:i:curate are still trying to lure artists, and now want them to sign a contract that gives arti:i:curate the right to reproduce art works for promption without asking the artists!
    Their promises – of shows, residencies, opportunities – is not worth the long long trouble that is seemingly bound to follow.
    Some shy away from speaking out. – I hope your account helps everyone to shy away from art:i:curate.

  6. You should definitely follow this up with a lawyer. It’s a serious breech of your copyright, and that they were selling the work is outrageous. Courts are sympathetic to copyright abuse when it’s so deliberate. [] Good luck ,and don’t let the scum bags get away with it. Hit them where it hurts this is theft just as much as if they’d snuck in your back door and pinched your tv..

  7. It’s not only a breach of copyright – it’s fraudulent. Criminal behaviour. Apart from defrauding you, they are also defrauding the art buyer who thinks they’re receiving a genuine artist-released artwork.

    Which country are they in? If it’s the UK, try both Trading Standards Authority (who I believe now have an IP enforcement team for criminal matters), and the police, referring to art fraud.

  8. So sorry you had to go thru this, I can not believe the sheer volume of unethical and immoral behavior I have heard about or personally encountered of late. Good luck to you in straightening everything out.

  9. This is utterly disgraceful. Visitors may like to know that the following organisation was set up some years ago to support the rights of artists and to highlight attempts to gain the use of their material through the use of competitions and in other ways. By supporting this organisation you can play a part in stopping the theft of the property of creatives.

  10. Horrible story. I hope the exposure and sales you can gain from your exposé more than make up the time and money you’ve had to waste chasing these people down.

  11. This is clearly a breach of copyright laws and just downright arrogant and disrespectful. I do hope you get a legal remedy and that they are not able to take advantage of anyone else. Keep us posted and let us know what we can do to support.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s